Automated Detection of Speech Timing Alterations in Autopsy-Confirmed Non-fluent/agrammatic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia

Neurology. 2022 May 27:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200750. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200750. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Motor speech function, including speech timing, is a key domain for diagnosing non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA). Yet, standard assessments employ subjective, specialist-dependent evaluations, undermining reliability and scalability. Moreover, few studies have examined relevant anatomo-clinical alterations in patients with pathologically-confirmed diagnoses. This study overcomes such caveats via automated speech timing analyses in a unique cohort of autopsy-proven cases.

METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we administered an overt reading task and quantified articulation rate, mean syllable and pause duration, and syllable and pause duration variability. Neuroanatomical disruptions were assessed via cortical thickness and white matter atrophy analysis.

RESULTS: We evaluated 22 persons with nfvPPA (mean age: 67.3; 13 females) and confirmed underlying four-repeat tauopathy, 15 persons with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA; mean age: 66.5; 8 females), and 10 healthy controls (HCs; 70 years; 5 females). All five speech timing measures revealed alterations in persons with nfvPPA relative to both the HC and svPPA groups, controlling for dementia severity. Articulation rate robustly discriminated individuals with nfvPPA from HCs (AUC = .95), outperforming specialist-dependent perceptual measures of dysarthria and apraxia of speech severity. Patients with nfvPPA exhibited structural abnormalities in left precentral and middle frontal as well as bilateral superior frontal regions, including their underlying white matter. Articulation rate correlated with atrophy of the left pars opercularis and supplementary/presupplementary motor areas. Secondary analyses showed that, controlling for dementia severity, all measures yielded greater deficits in patients with nfvPPA and corticobasal degeneration (nfvPPA-CBD, n = 12) than in those with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology (nfvPPA-PSP, n = 10). Articulation rate robustly discriminated between individuals in each subgroup (AUC = .82). More widespread cortical thinning was observed for the nfvPPA-CBD than the nfvPPA-PSP group across frontal regions.

DISCUSSION: Automated speech timing analyses can capture specific markers of nfvPPA while potentially discriminating between patients with different tauopathies. Thanks to its objectivity and scalability, this approach could support standard speech assessments.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that automated speech analysis can accurately differentiate patients with non-fluent PPA from normal controls and patients with semantic variant PPA.

PMID:35623892 | DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200750